4.5 Review

A new fracture prediction method by combining genetic algorithm with neural network in low-permeability reservoirs

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 159-166

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.06.033

关键词

low permeability; back propagation neural network; genetic algorithm; natural fracture; prediction method

资金

  1. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [2462011KYJJ0233]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural fractures in low permeability reservoirs are the dominant flow paths for the whole flow system. It is the difficult point to identify and predict natural fractures by using conventional logging data. Back propagation neural network is an effective method for natural fracture prediction, but it has the defect that convergence rate is slow and the objective function easily falls into the local minimum value. The genetic algorithm population search method can realize the optimal allocation if given network weights and threshold, which can improve back propagation neural network's defect of over-reliance on the gradient information and achieve the minimum global error. In this paper, by analyzing in-depth the relationship between observed fractures in the cores and well logging data, we proposed a new method of fracture identification in terms of deep-shallow laterolog curves as well as their amplitude difference and micro-electrode logging curves as well as its amplitude difference. The method was verified by oilfield dynamic monitoring data. In the application of the method to Xinli oilfield, the optimized standard samples were chosen to train the designed genetic algorithm back propagation neural network, and then the genetic algorithm-back propagation neural network for Xinli oilfield was established to predict fractures in the target reservoir. The prediction has good consistency with the oilfield's actual development performance, which proves the reliability of the new method. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据