4.5 Article

Large scale reactor details and results for the formation and decomposition of methane hydrates via thermal stimulation dissociation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 94-95, 期 -, 页码 19-27

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.06.018

关键词

methane hydrate; thermal stimulation; natural gas production; hydrate formation; hydrate decomposition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in-situ heating method to efficiently produce methane gas from hydrates was recently developed. It is a modification of the thermal stimulation method using a down-hole combustion technique, to more efficiently bring necessary heat to the desired location within the reservoir. To test the concept of methane production via in-situ heating and characterize other alternative production methods, a 701 reactor vessel has been designed, manufactured and assembled to simulate relevant field environments. Tests show that the reactor satisfies the conditions for both methane and carbon dioxide hydrate formation. During the tests hydrate was formed at 2.2 degrees C and 4.2 MPa using 99.97% pure methane gas and deionized water in unconsolidated porous quartz sand pack. Heating tests at 100 W resulted in a peak production rate of 1.5 standard liters per minute (slpm) of methane gas, resulting in the dissociation of 35% of total hydrate in the system. A thermal energy efficiency of 72% was calculated based on net thermal heat input and the total heating value of the methane produced during a 10 h test period. Based on mass balance and calculations using the Peng-Robinson EOS it was calculated that hydrate saturations of 4.5, 10.2, 21 and 33% were produced prior to heating tests. Phase equilibrium data is presented for mixed gas hydrates formed from a 50:50 mol fraction mixture of CO2:CH4. Measurements and simulations suggest that hydrate began forming at the top section of the reactor initially, and continued to form downwards within the sediment in a non-homogeneous manner. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据