4.5 Article

Measurement and revised interpretation of gas flow behavior in tight reservoir cores

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2008.12.017

关键词

tight reservoir; gas permeability; permeability measurement; gas slippage; Klinkenberg correlation

资金

  1. Petroleum Technology Research Center (PTRC)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As more attention has been paid to low permeability hydrocarbon resources, a reliable and fast method to determine permeability of tight reservoir cores is required by both industry and research organizations. Gas flow in tight cores presents more complications under laboratory conditions due to gas slip phenomenon. For over half a century, the Klinkenberg correlation has been widely used in laboratories to obtain gas permeability in tight porous media through linear extrapolation of measured apparent permeabilities to infinite mean test pressure. This paper presents an experimental method to study the slip effects in gas permeability measurements for low permeability cores by applying a backpressure at the outlet of test sample. By increasing backpressure step by step, the gas slip effect is gradually reduced and finally becomes negligible when backpressure reaches or exceeds a critical value. This pressure is defined as minimum backpressure in this study. Therefore, the non-slip gas permeability can be determined without using Klingkenberg correlation with backpressures equal to or greater than minimum backpressure. Evident discrepancies were also found between the Klinkenberg permeability and non-slip permeability for very low-permeability cores. This study provided a straightforward method to experimentally determine permeability of tight reservoir cores by using gases. The developed technique can also be applied in the measurement of relative gas-liquid permeabilities in multiphase flow systems where difficulties were found when using Klinkenberg correlation. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据