4.5 Article

A Novel Organotypic Dento-Epithelial Culture Model: Effect of Fusobacterium nucleatum Biofilm on B-Defensin-2,-3, and LL-37 Expression

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 242-247

出版社

AMER ACAD PERIODONTOLOGY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2011.110177

关键词

Beta-defensin 2; human; beta-defensin 3; human; epithelium; Fusobacterium nucleatum; LL-37 peptide

资金

  1. Universities of Helsinki (HUS-EVO) [T1020Y0008]
  2. Turku
  3. Turku University Foundation [388/211/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In the present study, the expression and localization of three epithelial peptides (human p-defensin [hBD]-2 and -3, and cathelicidin [LL-37]) are studied in an organotypic dento-epithelial (OD-E) model exposed to Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) biofilm. Methods: Biofilm of Fn ATCC 25586 or AHN 9508 were produced by culturing each strain on semipermeable membranes. The OD-E model was constructed by seeding keratinocytes on fibroblast-containing collagen gels and by placing dentin pieces on the top. A 3-day-old biofilm was placed on the top of the OD-E and the coculture was incubated for 5 hours or 24 hours. Production of epithelial antimicrobial peptides was determined immunohistochemically. Results: After 5 hours of incubation, the biofilm of each Fn strain stimulated expression of hBD-2 and -3. hBD-2 was localized on superficial layers and hBD-3 on basal cell layers of the epithelium and dento-epithelial junctions, whereas LL-37 was only weakly expressed. After 24 hours, hBD-2 expression was extended toward basal cell layers of the epithelium. In contrast, hBD-3 expression extended toward superficial layers of the epithelium. In the case of Fn AHN 9508 biofilm, LL-37 was localized in the cell layers of the dento-epithelial junction. Conclusion: In our OD-E model, epithelial antimicrobial peptide responses to Fn biofilms have distinct regulation and localization characteristics, resembling those known to occur in the gingival epithelium in vivo. J Periodontot 2012;83:242-247.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据