4.5 Article

A New Method for Alveolar Bone Repair Using Extracted Teeth for the Graft Material

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 81, 期 9, 页码 1264-1272

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.100016

关键词

Bone regeneration; bone substitute; grafts; bone; neural crest; tooth

资金

  1. High-Tech Research Center
  2. Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In the clinical field of jawbone formation, the use of autogenous bone as the graft material is the gold standard. However, there are some problems with this technique, such as risk of infection on the donor side, the limited amount of available bone mass, and marked resorption of the grafted bone. We investigated the potential for using teeth as a bone graft material for jawbone formation because the dental pulp contains stem cells, including undifferentiated neural crest derived cells. Methods: Alveolar bone defects were created in Wistar rats, and the defects were filled with either tooth or iliac bone graft material, or left as controls. The potential for using teeth as a bone graft material for jawbone formation was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction, microcomputed tomography, and histologic analysis. Results: Polymerase chain reaction revealed that the expressions of P75, PO, nestin, and musashi-1 were significantly higher in teeth than in mandibular bone and iliac bone grafts. Hematoxylin and eosin staining and microcomputed tomography showed that at 8 weeks, tooth graft material produced a similar amount of new bone compared to iliac bone graft material. Osteopontin was expressed in both the tooth and iliac bone graft material at 6 and 8 weeks after surgery. Dentin sialoprotein was expressed in the tooth graft material in the new bone at 6 weeks only. Conclusion: These results indicate that teeth may be an alternative material to autogenous bone for treating alveolar bone defects by grafting. J Periodontol 2010;81:1264-1272.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据