4.5 Article

Clinical Evaluation of a Biphasic Calcium Composite Grafting Material in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Intrabony Defects: A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 80, 期 11, 页码 1774-1782

出版社

AMER ACAD PERIODONTOLOGY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.090229

关键词

Bone graft; calcium phosphates; clinical trials; debridement; periodontitis; regeneration

资金

  1. Biocomposites, Keele, United Kingdom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of a novel biphasic calcium composite (BCC) biomaterial versus autogenous bone spongiosa (ABS) or open flap debridement (OFD) for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. Methods: Forty-five subjects with at least one intrabony defect with a probing depth (PD) >= 7 mm and a vertical radiographic bone loss 3 mm were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with BCC (n = 15), ABS (n = 15), or OFD (n = 15). Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and 12 months after surgery and included the plaque index, gingival index, PD, clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival recession. Results: In all treatment groups, significant PD reductions and CAL gains occurred during the study period (P<0.0001). At 12 months, patients treated with BCC exhibited a mean PD reduction of 3.6 +/- 0.7 mm and a mean CAL gain of 3.0 +/- 0.8 mm compared to baseline. Corresponding values for patients treated with ABS were 3.4 +/- 0.8 mm and 2.9 +/- 0.9 mm, whereas OFD sites produced values of 2.8 +/- 0.8 mm and 1.6 +/- 0.7 mm. Compared to OFD, the additional CAL gain was significantly greater in patients treated with BCC (P=0.002) and ABS (P=0.001). The additional PD reduction was significant for the BCC group (P=0.011) and borderline significant for the ABS group (P=0.059). There were no significant differences of PD and CAL changes between BCC and ABS groups. Conclusions: The clinical benefits of BCC were equivalent to ABS and superior to OFD alone. BCC may be an appropriate alternative to conventional graft materials. J Periodontol 2009;80:1774-1782.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据