4.4 Article

Relationship between xerostomia and gingival condition in young adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 74-79

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jre.12183

关键词

cross-sectional studies; gingival diseases; xerostomia; young adult

资金

  1. FUTOKU foundation, Tokyo, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and ObjectiveXerostomia is a subjective symptom of dryness in the mouth. Although a correlation between xerostomia and oral conditions in the elderly has been reported, there are few such studies in the young adults. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of xerostomia with the gingival condition in university students. Material and MethodsA total of 2077 students (1202 male subjects and 875 female subjects), 18-24years of age, were examined. The disease activity and severity of the gingival condition were assessed as the percentage of teeth with bleeding on probing (%BOP) and the presence of teeth with probing pocket depth of 4mm, respectively. Additional information on xerostomia, oral health behaviors, coffee/tea intake and nasal congestion was collected via a questionnaire. Path analysis was used to test pathways from xerostomia to the gingival condition. ResultsOne-hundred and eighty-three (8.8%) students responded that their mouths frequently or always felt dry. Xerostomia was related to %BOP and dental plaque formation, but was not related to the presence of probing pocket depth 4mm. In the structural model, xerostomia was related to dental plaque formation (p<0.01), and a lower level of dental plaque formation was associated with a lower %BOP. Xerostomia was associated with coffee/tea intake (p<0.01) and nasal congestion (p<0.001). ConclusionXerostomia was indirectly related to gingival disease activity through the accumulation of dental plaque. Nasal congestion and coffee/tea intake also affected xerostomia. These findings suggest that xerostomia should be considered in screening for gingivitis risk in young adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据