4.4 Article

Differences in the developmental origins of the periosteum may influence bone healing

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 4, 页码 468-478

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jre.12229

关键词

animal model; periodontal ligament; periodontal healing; regeneration; stem cells

资金

  1. High-Tech Research Center Project for Private Universities
  2. Special Subsidies in Subsidies for Ordinary Expenses of Private Schools from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and ObjectiveThe jaw bone, unlike most other bones, is derived from neural crest stem cells, so we hypothesized that it may have different characteristics to bones from other parts of the body, especially in the nature of its periosteum. The periosteum exhibits osteogenic potential and has received considerable attention as a grafting material for the repair of bone and joint defects. Material and MethodsGene expression profiles of jaw bone and periosteum were evaluated by DNA microarray and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, we perforated an area 2mm in diameter on mouse frontal and parietal bones. Bone regeneration of these calvarial defects was evaluated using microcomputed tomography and histological analysis. ResultsThe DNA microarray data revealed close homology between the gene expression profiles within the ilium and femur. The gene expression of Wnt-1, SOX10, nestin, and musashi-1 were significantly higher in the jaw bone than in other locations. Microcomputed tomography and histological analysis revealed that the jaw bone had superior bone regenerative abilities than other bones. ConclusionJaw bone periosteum exhibits a unique gene expression profile that is associated with neural crest cells and has a positive influence on bone regeneration when used as a graft material to repair bone defects. A full investigation of the biological and mechanical properties of jaw bone as an alternative graft material for jaw reconstructive surgery is recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据