4.4 Article

Evaluation of three selective media for isolation of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 549-552

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jre.12037

关键词

Aggregatibacter actinomycemcomitans; selective media; culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objective: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans is a pathogen in oral and nonoral infections. Detection and quantification of this pathogen can be performed using selective culture techniques. The aim of this study was to establish the efficacy of two known selective media in their ability to select and support the growth of A. actinomycetemcomitans. Material and Methods: Trypticase soy bacitracin vancomycin (TSBV) medium and brain-heart infusion agar with vancomycin (Dentaid-1), as well as a modified Dentaid-1 medium (in which the brain-heart infusion agar was substituted with brain-heart infusion broth), were compared. Two-hundred and eighteen clinical samples were used to establish the recovery rate, the number of colonyforming units (CFUs) of A. actinomycetemcomitans as well as the total number of CFUs on the three different types of medium. In addition, the numbers of gram-negative aerobic rods and yeasts were determined. Results: Both types of Dentaid-1 medium showed a higher recovery of A. actinomycetemcomitans compared with TSBV. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance. The total number of CFUs of A. actinomycetemcomitans recovered was significantly higher on Dentaid-1 compared with TSBV (p = 0.029). The mean number of gram-negative aerobic rods recovered was statistically higher on both types of Dentaid-1 medium in comparison with TSBV. Low numbers of yeasts were recovered occasionally on all test plates. Conclusion: Dentaid-1 is a low-cost effective alternative to TSBV for the isolation and growth of A. actinomycetemcomitans from clinical samples, such as dental plaque, which contain a complex microflora.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据