期刊
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 599-607出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01472.x
关键词
cell migration; cigarette smoke; gingival fibroblast; myofibroblast; nicotine
资金
- Chilean Fund for Science and Technology (FONDECYT) [1090142]
Silva D, Caceres M, Arancibia R, Martinez C, Martinez J, Smith P. Effects of cigarette smoke and nicotine on cell viability, migration and myofibroblastic differentiation. J Periodont Res 2012; 47: 599607. (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S Background and Objective: Several studies have analysed the role of nicotine as a prominent agent affecting wound repair in smokers. However, tobacco smoke contains several components that may alter gingival wound healing. The present study aimed to analyse the roles of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) and nicotine on cell viability, cell migration/invasion and myofibroblastic differentiation using primary cultures of human gingival fibroblasts. Material and Methods: To compare the effects of CSC and nicotine, gingival fibroblasts were stimulated with CSC (0.4500 mu g/mL) and the corresponding nicotine concentrations (0.02532 mu g/mL) present in research cigarettes (1R3F). Cell viability was evaluated through the MTS assay. Cell migration and invasion were assessed through scratch wound assays, collagen nested matrices and transwell migration. a-Smooth muscle actin production was evaluated by western blotting. Results: Cigarette smoke condensate at 50 mu g/mL induced a moderate increase in cell viability, whereas the corresponding nicotine concentration (3.2 mu g/mL) did not produce this response. Cigarette smoke condensate at 250 mu g/mL, but not nicotine at 16 mu g/mL (the corresponding nicotine concentration), induced cell death. Both nicotine and CSC stimulated cell migration (50 mu g/mL CSC; 3.2 mu g/mL nicotine). At 150 mu g/mL, CSC inhibited cell migration; however, the corresponding concentration of nicotine (9.6 mu g/mL), did not have this effect. Although both nicotine and CSC inhibited a-smooth muscle actin production, only the latter induced a statistically significant effect on this response. Conclusion: Cigarette smoke condensate may stimulate cell survival and migration at low concentrations and inhibit these cell responses at higher levels of exposure. Moreover, CSC may interfere in myofibroblastic differentiation. These results show that cigarette smoke, but not nicotine, may significantly alter cell viability, cell migration and myofibroblastic differentiation in gingival mesenchymal cells.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据