4.5 Article

α and 2p2n emission in fast neutron-induced reactions on 60Ni

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.064614

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  2. DOE [DE-AC52-06NA25396]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The cross sections for populating the residual nucleus in the reaction X-A(Z)(n, x) (Z-2) (A-4) Y exhibit peaks as a function of incident neutron energy corresponding to the (n, n'alpha) reaction and, at higher energy, to the (n, 2p3n) reaction. The relative magnitudes of these peaks vary with the Z of the target nucleus. Purpose: Study fast neutron-induced reactions on Ni-60. Locate experimentally the nuclear charge region along the line of stability where the cross sections for a emission and for 2p2n emission in fast neutron-induced reactions are comparable as a further test of reaction models. Methods: Data were taken by using the Germanium Array for Neutron-Induced Excitations. The broad-spectrum pulsed neutron beam of the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center's Weapons Neutron Research facility provided neutrons in the energy range from 1 to 250 MeV. The time-of-flight technique was used to determine the incident-neutron energies. Results: Absolute partial cross sections for production of seven discrete Fe. rays populated in Ni-60(n, alpha/2pxn gamma) reactions with 2 <= x <= 5 were measured for neutron energies 1 MeV < E-n < 250 MeV. Hauser-Feshbach plus pre-equilibrium theoretical calculations are compared to the experimental results. Conclusions: There is good agreement between experimental results and theoretical predictions at lower neutron energies while discrepancies appear at higher neutron energies. The cross section for producing an isotope in fast neutron-induced reactions on stable targets via a emission at the peak of the (n, alpha) and (n, n'alpha) reactions is comparable to that for 2p2n and 2p3n emission at higher incident energies in the nuclear charge region around Fe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据