4.3 Article

Effect of ibuprofen L-lysinate on bilirubin binding to albumin as measured by saturation index and horseradish peroxidase assays

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 287-290

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211925

关键词

intravenous ibuprofen; newborn; bilirubin binding; drug-bilirubin-albumin interaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To demonstrate, in vitro, the influence of increasing ibuprofen ( IBU) concentration on bilirubin - albumin ( B - A) binding. Study Design: The influence of IBU on B - A binding was measured by saturation index and horseradish peroxidase assays. B - A solutions were prepared at B: A ratios of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 and bilirubin concentrations of 5 and 10 mg per 100 ml. Drug concentrations used were 142.5, 200 and 285 mgl(-1) for IBU and 100 and 200 mgl(-1) for acetyl salicylic acid ( ASA). Similar tests were performed on premature newborn sera with bilirubin concentrations of 5 to 10 mg per 100 ml. Result: By the saturation index test, significant displacement of bilirubin from albumin with IBU was demonstrated only on B - A solution with high B: A ratio of 2.0 and IBU concentration of 285 mgl(-1) and was less as compared to ASA. No displacement was observed in the sera of jaundiced neonates. By the horseradish peroxidase assay using B - A solutions, free bilirubin was significantly increased at ( 1) increasing concentrations of bilirubin in solution and ( 2) increasing B: A ratios in a solution containing 5 mg per 100 ml of bilirubin. In the sera of jaundiced neonates, significantly higher free bilirubin concentrations were observed when IBU was added to serum with bilirubin concentration of 10 mg per 100 ml as compared to 5 mg per 100 ml ( 0.062 +/- 0.004 versus 0.026 +/- 0.005, P < 0.001 by Student's t- test). Conclusion: Displacement of bilirubin was demonstrated only at high IBU concentration and high B: A ratio. However, free bilirubin levels were not shown to increase with increasing IBU concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据