4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

The interaction of cell-penetrating peptides with lipid model systems and subsequent lipid reorganization: thermodynamic and structural characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEPTIDE SCIENCE
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 200-209

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/psc.1070

关键词

cell-penetrating peptide; antimicrobial peptide; peptide-membrane interaction; lipid supramolecular organization; differential scanning calorimetry; plasmon waveguide resonance spectroscopy; P-31-NMR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are cationic peptides that are able to induce cellular uptake and delivery of large and hydrophilic molecules, that otherwise do not cross the plasma membrane of eukaryotic cells. Despite their potential use for gene transfer and drug delivery, the mode of action of CPPs is still mysterious. Nonetheless, the interaction with phospholipid bilayers constitutes the first step in the process. The interaction of two CPPs with distinct charge distribution, penetratin (nonamphipathic) and RL16 (a secondary amphipathic peptide with antimicrobial properties) with lipid membranes was investigated. For this purpose, we employed three independent techniques, comprising 31 P-nuclear magnetic resonance, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and plasmon waveguide resonance (PWR) spectroscopy. In view of the cationic nature of the peptides, their interaction and affinity for zwitterionic versus anionic lipids was investigated. Although a strong affinity was observed when negative charged lipids were present, the peptides' thermodynamic behavior on binding to zwitterionic versus anionic lipids and the induced supramolecular structure organization in those lipids was quite different. The study suggests that the amphipathic profile and charge distribution of CPPs strongly influences the perturbation mechanism of the peptide on the bilayer establishing the frontier between a pure CPP and a CPP with antimicrobial properties. Copyright (C) 2008 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据