4.2 Article

MAP dendrimer elicits antibodies for detecting rat and mouse GH-binding proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEPTIDE SCIENCE
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 78-88

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/psc.1096

关键词

MAP dendrimer; antipeptide polyclonal antisera; GH-binding protein; GH receptor; GH

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM08194, GM60655]
  2. Sloan Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The membrane-bound rat GH-R and an alternatively spliced isoform, the soluble rat GH-BP, are comprised of identical N-terminal GH-binding domains; however, their C-terminal sequences differ. Immunological reagents are needed to distinguish between the two isoforms in order to understand their respective roles in mediating the actions of GH. Accordingly, a tetravalent MAP dendrimer with four identical branches of a C-terminal peptide sequence of the rat GH-BP (GH-BP263-279) was synthesized and used as an immunogen in rabbits. Solid-phase peptide synthesis of four GH-BP263-279 segments onto a tetravalent Lys(2)-Lys beta-Ala-OH core peptide was carried out using Fmoc chemistry. The mass of the RP-HPLC-purified synthetic product, 8398 Da, determined by ESI-MS, was identical to expected mass. Three anti-rat GH-BP263-279 MAP antisera, BETO-8039, BETO-8040, and BETO-8041, at dilutions of 10(-3), recognized both the rat GH-BP263-279 MAP and recombinant mouse GH-BP with ED(50)s within a range of 5-10 fmol, but did not cross-react with BSA in dot blot analyses. BETO-8041 antisera (10-3 dilution) recognized GH-BPs of rat serum and liver having M(r)s ranging from 35 to 130 kDa, but did not recognize full-length rat GH-Rs. The antisera also detected recombinant mouse GH-BPs. In summary, the tetravalent rat GH-BP263-279 MAP dendrimer served as an effective immunogenic antigen in eliciting high titer antisera specific for the C-termini of both rat and mouse GH-BPs. The antisera will facilitate studies aimed at improving our understanding of the biology of GH-BPs. Copyright (c) 2008 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据