4.6 Article

Major Depressive Disorder Screening Remains Low Even Among Privately Insured Adolescents

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 203-207

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.086

关键词

-

资金

  1. Penn State Social Science Research Institute and Children, Youth, & Family Consortium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine if screening for major depressive disorder (MDD) increased in a national sample of privately insured adolescents following the US Preventive Services Task Force 2009 endorsement of universal screening for adolescent MDD. Study design This was a retrospective cohort study of 12- to 14-year-old adolescents. continuously insured from 2010 to 2014 based on the MarketScan database. The primary outcome was the frequency of MDD screening, defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or Current Procedural Terminology code within the context of a well-visit. Multivariable analysis identified factors associated with MDD screening. Results Adolescents (n = 413 080) were 49% female and 89% urban, and 21% had a family history of depression. Adolescents averaged 2.9 +/- 1.6 well-visits during the 5-year study period. Of the cohort, 1.8% had MDD screening coded. Coding for MDD screening was more likely for urban residents (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.69-2.25; P < .001), those with conduct disorder (OR. 1.37; 95% CI, 1.14-1.64; P < .001). and adolescents with more well visits (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.21-1.31; P < .001). Coding for MDD screening was 96% less likely for those switching between multiple provider types for well-visits compared with pediatric providers. A family history of depression did not influence coding for MDD screening. Conclusions MDD screening remains insufficient to address the youth mental health crisis. Furthermore, this study captures those adolescents most able to receive such services, given their continuous enrollment in private insurance. Disparities persist, with adolescents who are rural, less frequently seen, and with poor continuity of care less likely to receive screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据