4.7 Review

Acinetobacter species as model microorganisms in environmental microbiology: current state and perspectives

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 99, 期 6, 页码 2533-2548

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6439-y

关键词

Taxonomy; Genomics; Quorum sensing; Motility; Antibiotic resistance; Hydrocarbon

资金

  1. NRF - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP) [2014R1A2A2A05007010]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A2A2A05007010] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acinetobacter occupies an important position in nature because of its ubiquitous presence in diverse environments such as soils, fresh water, oceans, sediments, and contaminated sites. Versatile metabolic characteristics allow species of this genus to catabolize a wide range of natural compounds, implying active participation in the nutrient cycle in the ecosystem. On the other hand, multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii causing nosocomial infections with high mortality has been raising serious concerns in medicine. Due to the ecological and clinical importance of the genus, Acinetobacter was proposed as a model microorganism for environmental microbiological studies, pathogenicity tests, and industrial production of chemicals. For these reasons, Acinetobacter has attracted significant attention in scientific and biotechnological fields, but only limited research areas such as natural transformation and aromatic compound degradation have been intensively investigated, while important physiological characteristics including quorum sensing, motility, and stress response have been neglected. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent achievements in Acinetobacter research with a special focus on strain DR1 and to compare the similarities and differences between species or other genera. Research areas that require more attention in future research are also suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据