4.6 Article

Kaposiform Lymphangiomatosis: A Distinct Aggressive Lymphatic Anomaly

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 164, 期 2, 页码 383-388

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Society of Hematology Trainee Research Grant
  2. National Institutes of Health's Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH NHLBI) [T32 HL007574, K08 HL089509]
  3. Lymphatic Malformation Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To describe the clinical and imaging characteristics of a new lymphatic disorder with a unique histological pattern and poor prognosis. Study design An observational, retrospective study identified and characterized 20 patients with distinct lymphatic histopathology referred to the Vascular Anomalies Center at Boston Children's Hospital between 1995 and 2011. Results The median age at onset was 6.5 years (range, birth to 44 years). Clinical and radiologic findings suggested a generalized process. The most common presentations were respiratory symptoms (50%), hemostatic abnormalities (50%), and an enlarging, palpable mass (35%). All patients had mediastinal involvement; 19 patients developed pericardial (70%) and/or pleural effusions (85%). Extrathoracic disease manifested in bone and spleen and less frequently in abdominal viscera, peritoneum, integument, and extremities. Despite aggressive procedural and medical therapies, the 5-year survival was 51% and the overall survival was 34%. Mean interval between diagnosis and death was 2.75 years (range, 1-6.5 years). Conclusions We describe a clinicopathologicallydistinct lymphatic anomaly. We propose the term kaposiform lymphangiomatosis (KLA) because of characteristic clusters or sheets of spindled lymphatic endothelial cells accompanying malformed lymphatic channels. The intrathoracic component is most commonly implicated in morbidity and mortality; however, extrathoracic disease is frequent, indicating that KLA is not restricted to pulmonary lymphatics. The mortality rate of KLA is high despite aggressive multimodal therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据