4.6 Article

Factors Associated with Permanent Hearing Impairment in Infants Treated with Therapeutic Hypothermia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 163, 期 4, 页码 995-1000

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Moulton Charitable Foundation
  2. Sport Aiding Medical Research for Kids (SPARKS)
  3. University of Bristol Alumni Foundation
  4. Sparks Charity [05BTL01] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To define the incidence of hearing impairment, document plasma gentamicin concentrations, and identify factors associated with permanent hearing impairment in infants subjected to therapeutic hypothermia for moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy. Study design Data were collected prospectively in a regional center providing therapeutic hypothermia. Cooled infants at >= 36 weeks gestation with moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy were analyzed if a full dataset was available (n = 108), including clinical variables and gentamicin trough levels. Infants with hearing impairment were identified, and survivors were followed up with neurodevelopmental evaluation at age 18 months. Stepwise logistic regression identified factors associated with hearing impairment. Results Nine infants died, and among the survivors, 10.1% developed a permanent hearing impairment. The trough gentamicin level was above the recommended cutoff of 2 mg/L in 37% of the infants in the entire cohort and in 90% of the infants with hearing impairment. Logistic regression analysis identified high trough gentamicin level, low cord pH, and hypoglycemia (<46.8 mg/dL) in the first postnatal hour as significantly associated with hearing impairment. The need for inotropic support was close to significant (P = .055). Conclusion Hearing impairment was a common finding among cooled infants. Plasma gentamicin levels were commonly >2 mg/L. Based on these findings, we propose changes in gentamicin dosing interval and trough level monitoring to minimize the risk of potentially toxic levels in cooled newborns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据