4.6 Article

Cow's Milk Challenge Increases Weakly Acidic Reflux in Children with Cow's Milk Allergy and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 161, 期 3, 页码 476-+

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.03.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [W1018A, V1258, W1018C, V1222] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To assess and compare the pattern of reflux in a selected population of infants with cow's milk (CM) allergy (CMA) and suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) while on dietary exclusion and following challenge with CM. Study design Seventeen children (median age: 14 months) with a proven diagnosis of CMA and suspected GERD underwent 48-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. For the first 24 hours, the infants were kept on amino acid-based formula, and for the subsequent 24 hours, they were challenged with CM. Results The total reflux episodes and the number of weakly acidic episodes were higher during CM challenge compared with the amino acid-based formula period [total reflux episodes: 105 (58-127.5) vs 65 (39-87.5), P < .001; weakly acidic episodes: 53 (38.5-60.5) vs 19 (13-26.5), P < .001; median (25th-75th)]. No differences were found for either acid or weakly alkaline episodes (not significant). The number of weakly acidic episodes reaching the proximal, mid, and distal esophagus was higher duringCMchallenge (P < .001). No differences were found in either acid exposure time or number of long-lasting episodes (not significant). Conclusions In children with CMA and suspected GERD, CM exposure increases the number of weakly acidic reflux episodes. CM challenge during 48-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring identifies a subgroup of patients with allergen-induced reflux, and in selected cases of children with CMA in whom GERD is suspected, its use could be considered as part of diagnostic work-up. (J Pediatr 2012;161:476-81).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据