4.6 Article

Factors Affecting Growth in Infants with Single Ventricle Physiology: A Report from the Pediatric Heart Network Infant Single Ventricle Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 159, 期 6, 页码 1017-U189

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.05.051

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL068269, HL068270, HL068279, HL068281, HL068285, HL068292, HL068290, HL068288, HL085057]
  2. US Food and Drug Administration Office of Orphan Products Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To describe growth patterns in infants with single ventricle physiology and determine factors influencing growth. Study design Data from 230 subjects enrolled in the Pediatric Heart Network Infant Single Ventricle Enalapril Trial were used to assess factors influencing change in weight-for-age z-score (z) from study enrollment (0.7 +/- 0.4 months) to pre-superior cavopulmonary connection (SCPC; 5.1 +/- 1.8 months, period 1) and pre-SCPC to final study visit (14.1 +/- 0.9 months, period 2). Predictor variables included patient characteristics, feeding regimen, clinical center, and medical factors during neonatal (period 1) and SCPC hospitalizations (period 2). Univariate regression analysis was performed, followed by backward stepwise regression and bootstrapping reliability to inform a final multivariable model. Results Weights were available for 197 of 230 subjects for period 1 and 173 of 197 subjects for period 2. For period 1, greater gestational age, younger age at study enrollment, tube feeding at neonatal hospitalization discharge, and clinical center were associated with a greater negative z (poorer growth) in multivariable modeling (adjusted R(2) = 0.39, P < .001). For period 2, younger age at SCPC and greater daily caloric intake were associated with greater positive z (better growth; R(2) = 0.10, P = .002). Conclusions Aggressive nutritional support and earlier SCPC are modifiable factors associated with a favorable change in weight-for-age z-score. (J Pediatr 2011;159:1017-22).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据