4.6 Article

Why Do Low-Income Minority Parents Choose Human Papillomavirus Vaccination for Their Daughters?

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 157, 期 4, 页码 617-622

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health [K12-HD43444]
  2. American Cancer Society Boston University [IRG-72-001-33-IRG]
  3. American College of Obstetrics Gynecology
  4. Merck Company Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To explore low-income minority parents' attitudes, intentions, and actions with regard to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for their daughters. Study design Semistructured interviews were conducted in English and Spanish with parents of girls aged 11-18 who were attending clinic visits in an urban medical center and a community health center. We assessed intention with formal scales, probed parents' attitudes regarding vaccination with open-ended questions, and reviewed medical records to determine vaccination rates. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods. Results Seventy-six parents participated (43% African American, 28% Latino, and 26% Caucasian). Most were mothers, had completed high school, and described themselves as religious; nearly one-half were immigrants. Intention correlated highly with receipt of the vaccine; 91% of parents intended to vaccinate their daughters against HPV, and 89% of the girls received vaccination within 12 months of the interview. Qualitative analysis revealed that most parents focused on the vaccine's potential to prevent cervical cancer. Some parents expressed concerns about unknown side effects and promotion of unsafe sexual practices, but these concerns did not hinder acceptance in most cases. Conclusions The majority of the low-income minority parents surveyed viewed HPV vaccination as a way to protect their daughters from cancer, and thus chose to vaccinate their daughters. (J Pediatr 2010; 157:617-22).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据