4.6 Article

Gastric Acid Inhibition for Fat Malabsorption or Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Cystic Fibrosis: Longitudinal Effect on Bacterial Colonization and Pulmonary Function

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 155, 期 5, 页码 629-633

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.06.040

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wilhelmina Research Fund [OZF 2005/04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To investigate bacterial colonization and pulmonary function longitudinally in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) receiving drugs for gastric acid (GA) inhibition for fat malabsorption or for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Study design A retrospective cohort study of 218 pediatric patients with CF was performed. Multilevel modeling was used to perform longitudinal analysis of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), maximum expiratory flow at 50% of FVC (MEF50), and maximal mid-expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (MMEF25-75). Cox regression was used to calculate Pseudomonas aeruginosa- and Staphylococcus aureus-free survival. Results Patients with CF and GA inhibition had a significantly smaller yearly decline of MEF50 and MMEF25-75 compared with control subjects. Other pulmonary function parameters and P aeruginosa or S aureus acquisition or colonization were not different from that of control subjects. GERD was associated with a significantly reduced pulmonary function (FEV1 and FVC) and an earlier acquisition of P aeruginosa and S aureus. Conclusions GA inhibition did not affect pulmonary function or bacterial acquisition and therefore is not contraindicated in patients with CF. GA inhibition might improve pulmonary function with time, because the decline of MEF50 and MMEF25-75 was less pronounced. GERD was associated with a reduced pulmonary function and an earlier acquisition of P aeruginosa and S aureus. Therefore the diagnosis and treatment of GERD should be aggressively pursued in patients with CF. (J Pediatr 2009; 155: 629-33).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据