4.6 Article

Effects of Influenza Plus Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination Versus Influenza Vaccination Alone in Preventing Respiratory Tract Infections in Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 153, 期 6, 页码 764-770

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.060

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate the effects of influenza vaccination with or without heptavalent pneumococeal conjugate vaccination on respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in children. Study design This vas a randomized. double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comprising 579 children age IS to 72 months with a previous history of physician-diagnosed RTI, recruited between 2003 and 2005. The children were assigned to 2 doses of parenteral inactivated trivalent subunit influenza plus heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (TIV+PCV7), influenza plus placebo vaccination (TIV+plac), or control hepatitis B virus vaccination plus placebo (HBV+plac). Main outcome measures were febrile RTI and related polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed influenza, primary care visits, antibiotic prescriptions, and acute otitis media (AOM) episodes. Results During influenza seasons, febrile RTI were reduced by 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1% to 42%) in the TIV+PCV7 group and by 13% (95% CI = -12% to 32%) in the TIV+plac group compared with the control group. The occurrence of PCR-confirmed influenza was reduced by 52% (95% CI = 7% to 75%) in the TIV+PCV7 group and by 51% (95% CI = 3% to 75%) in the TIV+plac group. Episodes of AOM were reduced by 57% (95% CI = 6% to 80%) in the TIV+PCV7 group and by 71% (95% CI = 30% to 88%) in the TIV+plac group. Outside of the influenza seasons, no significant effects of vaccinations were demonstrated on the studied outcomes. Conclusions During influenza seasons, influenza vaccination with or without pneumococcal conjugate vaccination substances reduced cases of confirmed influenza and AOM episodes. (J Pediatr 2008;153:764-70)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据