4.4 Article

Initial hematocrit predicts the use of blood transfusion in the pediatric trauma patient

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 49, 期 11, 页码 1678-1682

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.044

关键词

Hematocrit; Transfusion; Children; Adolescents; Kids

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N140610670]
  2. U.S. Army Medical Research & Material Command [09078015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Initial hematocrit (Hct) is generally not considered a marker of acute blood loss because it is assumed that physiologic response of fluid conservation to hemorrhage is delayed. We challenged this idea by theorizing that admission Hct correlates with conventional signs of shock and predicts the use of blood transfusion during resuscitation of pediatric trauma patients. Methods: Data from 1928 pediatric admissions (<18 years) at a Level I trauma center (2000-2012) were compared using standard statistical analyses and logistic regression modeling to identify factors associated with blood transfusion during initial trauma resuscitation. Results: Overall mortality rate was 3.5%, with a transfusion rate of 10.7%. Factors significantly associated with transfusion were initial Hct, Glasgow Coma Score, base deficit, and injury severity score (all p < 0.001). Initial Hct is a stronger predictor for transfusion (area under receiver operator curve (AUC: 0.728) compared to age-specific tachycardia (AUC: 0.689), age-specific hypotension (AUC: 0.673), and altered mental status (AUC: 0.654)). On multivariate analysis, initial Hct was an independent predictor (OR [95% CI]: 2.94 [1.56, 5.52]) along with hypotension (6.37 [2.95, 13.8]), base deficit (4.14 [1.38, 12.4]), and tachycardia (3.07 [1.62, 5.81]). Conclusions: Initial Hct correlates significantly with conventional signs of shock and is a strong independent predictor for blood transfusion with better predictability than other clinical factors. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据