4.4 Article

The surgical management of insulinomas in children

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 48, 期 12, 页码 2517-2524

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.04.022

关键词

Insulinoma; Intraoperative ultrasound; Localization; Pancreatic tumor; Pancreatectomy children

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R37 DK056268, R01 DK056268] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Insulinomas are rare pediatric tumors for which optimal localization studies and management remainundetermined. We present our experiencewithsurgicalmanagement of insulinomas during childhood. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent surgical management for an insulinoma from 1999 to 2012. Results: The study included eight patients. Preoperative localization was successful with abdominal ultrasound, abdominal CT, endoscopic ultrasound, or MRI in only 20%, 28.6%, 40%, and 50% of patients, respectively. Octreotide scan was non-diagnostic in 4 patients. For diagnostic failure, selective utilization of 18-Fluoro-DOPA PET/CT scanning, arterial stimulation/venous sampling, or transhepatic portal venous sampling were successful in insulinoma localization. Intraoperatively, all lesions were identified by palpation or with the assistance of intraoperative ultrasound. Surgical resection using pancreas sparing techniques (enucleation or distal pancreatectomy) resulted in a cure in all patients. Postoperative complications included a pancreatic fistula in two patients and an additional missed insulinoma in a patient with MEN-1 requiring successful reoperation. Conclusions: Preoperative tumor localization may require many imaging modalities to avoid unsuccessful blind pancreatectomy. Intraoperative palpation with the assistance of ultrasound offers a reliable method to precisely locate the insulinoma. Complete surgical resection results in a cure. Recurrent symptoms warrant evaluation for additional lesions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据