4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Dietary bile acid supplementation improves intestinal integrity and survival in a murine model

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 1256-1265

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.094

关键词

Bile salts; Taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA); Intestinal injury; Apoptosis; Proliferation

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R21 DK075409-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: In vitro supplementation of the bile salt, taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA), has been shown to stimulate proliferation and prevent intestinal apoptosis in IEC-6 cells. We hypothesize that addition of TDCA to a rodent liquid diet will be protective against induced intestinal injury. Methods: C57B16 mice were fed a liquid diet with or without 50-mg/(kg d) TDCA supplementation. After 6 days, the mice were injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (10 mg/kg) to induce intestinal injury. Specimens were obtained 24 hours later and evaluated for intestinal apoptosis, crypt proliferation, and villus length. A separate cohort of animals was injected with LPS (25 mg/kg) and followed 7 days for survival. Results: Mice whose diet was supplemented with TDCA had significantly increased survival. After LPS-induced injury, mice supplemented with TDCA showed decreased intestinal apoptosis by both H&E and caspase-3. They also had increased intestinal proliferation by 5-bromo-2'deoxyuridine staining and increased villus length. Conclusions: Dietary TDCA supplementation alleviates mucosal damage and improves survival after LPS-induced intestinal injury. Taurodeoxycholic acid is protective of the intestinal mucosa by increasing resistance to injury-induced apoptosis, stimulating enterocyte proliferation, and increasing villus length. Taurodeoxycholic acid supplementation also results in an increased survival benefit. Therefore, bile acid supplementation may potentially protect the intestine from injury or infection. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据