4.1 Article

A Comparison of Early Versus Late Conversion From Intravenous to Oral Therapy in the Treatment of Septic Arthritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 636-642

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b2b860

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Clinical outcomes of children with bacterial septic arthritis, common in the pediatric age group, are often satisfactory with early recognition, prompt surgical drainage, and appropriate antibiotic therapy. However, the optimal duration and route of antibiotic administration for treatment of septic arthritis continues to be debated, as traditional treatment favored longer intravenous (IV) therapies yet oral regimens are increasingly available that are more cost effective, safe and produce satisfactory disease resolution. Methods: Records of 186 patients from two children's hospitals, one that was thought to convert from IV to oral antibiotic therapy considerably earlier than the other, treated between 1985 and 1995 for bacterial septic arthritis were reviewed. Patients with concurrent osteomyelitis were excluded. Results: Patients at Hospital #1 were converted to oral antibiotics after 7.4 +/- 7.4 days of IV antibiotic therapy and at Hospital #2 after 18.6 +/- 13.6 (P < 0.001) days of IV therapy. Both groups received an average of four weeks of total antibiotic treatment. There was similar time to defervescence (2.4 +/- 3.2 d vs. 2.4 +/- 3.8 d, P > 0.05) and to normalization of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (35.7 +/- 19.7 d vs. 33.8 +/- 44.9 d, P > 0.05) in the patients converted to oral therapy early compared to those converted late. One case of mild avascular necrosis with no clinical disability developed in a patient from Hospital #2. Conclusions: We conclude that the clinical outcome in patients with septic arthritis converted to oral antibiotic therapy early in their treatment based on defined criteria was similar to those converted late.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据