4.3 Article

Premature Delivery Reduces Intestinal Cytoskeleton, Metabolism, and Stress Response Proteins in Newborn Formula-Fed Pigs

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318288cf71

关键词

enteral formula feeding; necrotizing enterocolitis; preterm neonate; proteomics; term neonate

资金

  1. Danish Research Councils
  2. University of Copenhagen
  3. University of Hong Kong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Preterm infants often show intolerance to the first enteral feeds, and the structural and functional basis of this intolerance remains unclear. We hypothesized that preterm and term neonates show similar gut trophic responses to feeding but different expression of intestinal functional proteins, thus helping to explain why preterm neonates are more susceptible to feeding-induced disorders such as necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Methods: Incidence of feeding-induced NEC, intestinal mass, and brush border enzyme activities, and the intestinal proteome in preterm cesarean-delivered pigs were compared with the corresponding values in pigs delivered spontaneously at term. Results: For both preterm and term pigs, mucosal mass and maltase activity increased (50%-100%), whereas lactase decreased (-50%), relative to values at birth. Only preterm pigs were highly NEC sensitive (30% vs 0% in term pigs, P<0.05). By gel-based proteomics, 36 identified proteins differed in expression, with most proteins showing downregulation in preterm pigs, including proteins related to intestinal structure and actin filaments, stress response, protein processing, and nutrient metabolism. Conclusions: Despite that enteral feeding induces rapid gut tropic response in both term and preterm neonates, the expression level of cellular proteins related to mucosal integrity, metabolism, and stress response differed markedly (including complement 3, prohibitin, ornithine carbamoyltransferase, and arginosuccinate synthetase). These proteins may play a role in the development of functional gut disorders and NEC in preterm neonates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据