4.3 Article

Ileal Immune Dysregulation in Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Role of CD40/CD40L in the Pathogenesis of Disease

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182039bad

关键词

CD40; CD40 ligand; IL-10; IL-10R beta; ileum

资金

  1. SUNY Downstate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: CD40, a co-stimulatory molecule, plays a critical role in coordinating enteric inflammatory immune responses. In necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), upregulation of IL-10, a CD40-modulated cytokine, has been described, but the role of the IL-10 receptor (IL-10R beta), CD40, and its ligand CD40L in disease pathogenesis is unknown. The study herein investigates ileal expression of CD40, CD40L, and IL-10R in a rat model of NEC. Subjects and Methods: NEC was induced in newborn rats using established methods of formula feeding, asphyxia, and cold stress. Expression of CD40, CD40L, IL-10R beta, and other proinflammatory molecules, including Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) and IL-18, was assessed by immunoblotting. Tissue infiltration by macrophages, monocytes, and T cells was examined by confocal immunohistochemistry. Results: Ileum from rat pups with NEC showed increased expression of TLR-4, IL-18, and IL-10R beta. Sections from both NEC and control pups demonstrated preservation of ileal cells expressing CD40/CD40L. The distal ileum of controls expressed both CD40 and CD40L; conversely, neither molecule was detected in ileal tissue from NEC pups. Additional studies showed that treatment with epidermal growth factor (EGF), previously shown to ameliorate the severity of NEC in an animal model, did not restore CD40 expression. Conclusions: Ileal cytokine dysregulation, manifested by decreased CD40/CD40L and increased IL-10R beta expression, may be involved in the pathogenesis of NEC. Dampened CD40 signaling may be related to enhanced IL-10 expression and a suppressed T-cell response to injury. We speculate that augmenting CD40-CD40L interactions may achieve a protective effect in this NEC model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据