4.3 Article

Gastrointestinal complications of inherited epidermolysis bullosa: Cumulative experience of the national epidermolysis bullosa registry

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31812f5667

关键词

epidermolysis bullosa; esophageal strictures; gastrointestinal

资金

  1. NIADDK NIH HHS [N01 AM62271] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [K24 AR02098, N01 AR22201, N01 AR72233, N01 AR22200] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Portions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract may be severely involved in patients with inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB). Evidence-based data are lacking as to the frequency and time of onset of these complications. Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were analyzed on 3,280 and 450 patients with EB, respectively, who were followed from 1986-2002 as part of the National EB Registry, an epidemiological study that attempted to identify, enroll, and collect data on every EB patient residing within the continental United States. Frequencies of abnormalities arising within the esophagus, stomach, small and large intestines, rectum, and anus were determined for each major EB subtype. Cumulative risks were similarly calculated for esophageal stenoses or strictures, and for severe growth retardation. Results: Esophageal strictures and growth retardation were commonly seen among the more severe EB subtypes, most notably Hallopeau-Siemens recessive dystrophic EB, and occurred as early as within the first year of life. EB subtype-specific differences were also observed in the frequency of occurrence of other GI complications. Discussion: A variety of GI complications arise in patients with inherited EB, varying across the major EB subtypes in their relative severity, frequency, and time of onset. Conclusions: Data generated by the National EB Registry should provide a sound basis whereby evidence-based strategies can be implemented for more effective surveillance and treatment of specific GI complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据