4.1 Article

The Quality of Life of Adolescents with Menstrual Problems

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.11.004

关键词

Adolescents; Quality of life; Menstrual disorders; Dysmenorrhea; Heavy menstrual bleeding; Amenorrhea; Oligomenorrhea

资金

  1. Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education
  2. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To date, very few publications have examined the health related quality of life (HRQL) in the younger population with menstrual problems, despite their high prevalence in adolescent girls. We describe the health-related quality of life (HRQL) among adolescents with menstrual problems and identified factors that have an impact on it. Methods: The study was a questionnaire study (using PedsQL 4.0) of adolescents aged 13-18 referred to a tertiary gynecology center for menstrual problems between June 2009 and August 2010. Results: One hundred eighty-four adolescents completed the questionnaires. The mean age was 15.10 +/- 1.49 with the mean body mass index (BMI) of 22.83 +/- 4.82 kg/m(2). The most common menstrual problems seen in the clinic were dysmenorrhea (38.6%) followed by heavy bleeding (33.6%), oligomenorrhea (19.6%), and amenorrhea (8.2%). The mean overall score was 70.40 +/- 16.36 with 42.3% having a score below 1 standard deviation (SD) from the norms. Adolescents with dysmenorrhea had the poorest score in physical function, whereas those with amenorrhea had the lowest score in psychosocial function. Maternal parenting style, parental anxiety, adolescents' ill-health behavior, and BMI have been found to have impact on the girls' quality of life (QoL). Conclusion: Although menstrual problems are not life threatening, they can pose a significant impact on the quality of life of these patients. Identification of these impacts might lead to the recognition of potential services or education to improve this. Understanding the characteristics that predict QoL may help a clinician identify patients who are risk for poor QoL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据