4.1 Article

Effect of Weight Loss on Menstrual Function in Adolescents with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.01.002

关键词

Polycystic ovary syndrome; Adolescents; Lifestyle modification; Weight loss; Treatment

资金

  1. Long Island Jewish Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objective: To compare the effects of a hypocaloric low-fat diet with those of a very low carbohydrate diet on body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and menstrual function in overweight adolescent females with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Design: Randomized pilot trial of two diets in a prospective, 12-week study. Setting: A hospital-based, academic adolescent medicine division. Participants: 24 females, age 12-22 years (mean 15.8 +/- 2.2), with PCOS and a BMI above the 85(th) percentile for age (mean 35.7 +/- 6.0 kg/m(2)). Interventions: Nutrition counseling was given biweekly, and dietary compliance, menstrual history, and weight were recorded. WC was measured at the beginning and end of the study. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in weight. BMI, WC, and improvement in menstrual function over the course of the study period. Results: 16 participants completed the study. 12 completers menstruated during the study period, 8 with regularity. The number of periods over 3 months increased from 0.6 +/- 0.6 pre-treatment to 1.6 +/- 1.3 post-treatment (P = 0.003). Overall, weight loss averaged 6.5% (P < 0.0001) and the WC decreased by an average of 5.7 +/- 7.7 cm (P = 0.01). Those who lost weight were 3.4 times more likely to have improved menstrual function (P = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions: Weight loss is feasible in adolescents with PCOS and results in significant improvements in BMI, WC, and menstrual function. Weight management may be preferable as first-line treatment in adolescents, because it targets both the menstrual dysfunction and risk factors for long-term morbidity associated with PCOS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据