4.7 Article

High frequency of BRAF V600E mutations in ameloblastoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 232, 期 5, 页码 492-498

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/path.4317

关键词

EGFR; targeted therapy; ameloblastoma; oncogenic mutation; odontogenic tumour; BRAF

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [137845]
  2. Finnish Cancer Organizations
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Turku University Central Hospital
  5. Mariza and Reino Salonen Foundation
  6. French Ministry of Health [AOM09186]
  7. UK Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), a comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  8. Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust
  9. Academy of Finland (AKA) [137845, 137845] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ameloblastoma is a benign but locally infiltrative odontogenic neoplasm. Although ameloblastomas rarely metastasise, recurrences together with radical surgery often result in facial deformity and significant morbidity. Development of non-invasive therapies has been precluded by a lack of understanding of the molecular background of ameloblastoma pathogenesis. When addressing the role of ERBB receptors as potential new targets for ameloblastoma, we discovered significant EGFR over-expression in clinical samples using real-time RT-PCR, but observed variable sensitivity of novel primary ameloblastoma cells to EGFR-targeted drugs in vitro. In the quest for mutations downstream of EGFR that could explain this apparent discrepancy, Sanger sequencing revealed an oncogenic BRAF V600E mutation in the cell line resistant to EGFR inhibition. Further analysis of the clinical samples by Sanger sequencing and BRAF V600E-specific immunohistochemistry demonstrated a high frequency of BRAF V600E mutations (15 of 24 samples, 63%). These data provide novel insight into the poorly understood molecular pathogenesis of ameloblastoma and offer a rationale to test drugs targeting EGFR or mutant BRAF as novel therapies for ameloblastoma. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据