4.7 Article

Human adipocyte function is impacted by mechanical cues

期刊

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 233, 期 2, 页码 183-195

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/path.4347

关键词

3D culture; fibrosis; adipocytes; human obesity

资金

  1. University Pierre et Marie Curie
  2. National Agency of Research (ANR Adipofib)
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM team)
  4. European Community Seventh Framework Programme [201100]
  5. French government grant (programme 'Investments for the Future') [ANR-10-IAHU]
  6. Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris [APHP
  7. Programmes of Clinical Investigation (PHRC)] [0702]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibrosis is a hallmark of human white adipose tissue (WAT) during obesity-induced chronic inflammation. The functional impact of increased interstitial fibrosis (peri-adipocyte fibrosis) on adjacent adipocytes remains unknown. Here we developed a novel in vitro3D culture system in which human adipocytes and decellularized material of adipose tissue (dMAT) from obese subjects are embedded in a peptide hydrogel. When cultured with dMAT, adipocytes showed decreased lipolysis and adipokine secretion and increased expression/production of cytokines (IL-6, G-CSF) and fibrotic mediators (LOXL2 and the matricellular proteins THSB2 and CTGF). Moreover, some alterations including lipolytic activity and fibro-inflammation also occurred when the adipocyte/hydrogel culture was mechanically compressed. Notably, CTGF expression levels correlated with the amount of peri-adipocyte fibrosis in WAT from obese individuals. Moreover, dMAT-dependent CTGF promoter activity, which depends on 1-integrin/cytoskeleton pathways, was enhanced in the presence of YAP, a mechanosensitive co-activator of TEAD transcription factors. Mutation of TEAD binding sites abolished the dMAT-induced promoter activity. In conclusion, fibrosis may negatively affect human adipocyte function via mechanosensitive molecules, in part stimulated by cell deformation. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据