4.7 Article

A core microRNA signature associated with inducers of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

期刊

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 232, 期 3, 页码 319-329

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/path.4289

关键词

EMT; miRNA; DNA methylation; endometrial carcinosarcoma

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) [PI080971]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN)
  3. European Development Regional Fund [RD06/0020/0013]
  4. Junta de Andalucia (Consejeria de Salud) [PI-0384/2007, PI0581/2009]
  5. MICINN [SAF-2010-21143, CSD2007-00017, SAF2010-20175]
  6. Comunidad de Madrid [S2010/BMD-2303]
  7. Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer [AECC 2011]
  8. ISCIII-Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [RD12/0036/0064, RD12/0036/0007]
  9. Consejeria de Salud, Junta de Andalucia [PI0581/2009]
  10. ISCIII [RD06/0020/0013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although it is becoming clear that certain miRNAs fulfil a fundamental role in the regulation of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a comprehensive study of the miRNAs associated with this process has yet to be performed. Here, we profiled the signature of miRNA expression in an in vitro model of EMT, ectopically expressing in MDCK cells one of seven EMT transcription factors (SNAI1, SNAI2, ZEB1, ZEB2, TWIST1, TWIST2 or E47) or the EMT inducer LOXL2. In this way, we identified a core subset of deregulated miRNAs that were further validated in vivo, studying endometrial carcinosarcoma (ECS), a tumour entity that represents an extreme example of phenotypic plasticity. Moreover, epigenetic silencing through DNA methylation of miRNA genes of the miR-200 family and miR-205 that are down-regulated during EMT was evident in both the in vitro (MDCK transfectants) and in vivo (ECS) models of EMT. The strong correlation between expression and DNA methylation suggests a major role for this epigenetic mark in the regulation of the miR-141-200c locus. Copyright (c) 2013 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据