4.1 Article

Involvement of Palliative Care Services Strongly Predicts Place of Death in Belgium

期刊

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 1461-1468

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0279

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Place of death is considered a quality indicator of end-of-life care and enabling people to die were they choose is an important aspiration of palliative care. This study aims to examine the association between involvement of palliative care services and place of death. Methods: Data about patient characteristics, use of general health care, and involvement of palliative care services in nonsudden or expected deaths in all health care settings in 2005-2006 (N = 1690) were collected by a surveillance network of general practitioners (GPs) in Belgium. Bivariate and multivariate associations between involvement of palliative care services and dying at home, in hospital, in a care home, or in a palliative care unit were examined using chi(2) tests and Wald tests. Results: Palliative care services were involved in 21.8% of deaths of those living at home, in 29.1% of those living in care homes, and in 12.4% of deaths in hospital. People were more likely to die in their usual residence rather than in hospital if multidisciplinary palliative home care teams (odds ratio [OR]: 8.4, confidence interval [CI]: 4.7-15.1) or the palliative care reference persons of their care home (OR: 9.4, CI: 3.3-26.7) were involved. Involvement of multidisciplinary palliative support teams in hospitals was associated with lower chances of dying at home (OR: 0.3, CI: 0.1-0.9). High involvement of GPs was not directly associated with out-of-hospital death. Discussion: Involving multidisciplinary palliative home care teams and palliative care reference persons in care homes could support people in dying out-of-hospital. Health care policy-makers should consider strategies to improve involvement of palliative care services in all health care settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据