4.6 Article

Origin of tunnel electroresistance effect in PbTiO3-based multiferroic tunnel junctions

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 92, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.035130

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB 762]
  2. Catalan Agency for Management of University [BP-A00220, BP-A_2 00014]
  3. Research Grants (AGAUR-Generalitat de Catalunya)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism of the tunnel electroresistance effect of a Co/PbTiO3/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 multiferroic tunnel junction is studied in detail using experimental and theoretical methods. Based on experimental data, we present a model that explains the correlation between the polarization of the ferroelectric material and the observed resistance state based on the effective change of the tunnel barrier thickness. We show that the observed thickness variation can neither be completely attributed to the asymmetric inverse piezoelectric effect in the classical sense, nor to asymmetric screening of the polarization charge. The analysis of detailed ab initio calculations quantitatively demonstrates that a mixture of electronic and structural phenomena is responsible for the change in effective tunnel barrier thickness upon polarization reversal. On the one hand, the ferroelectric material exhibits a reversible metallization at one of the interfaces, which shifts the boundary between the ferroelectric material and the electrode. On the other hand, a piezoelectric effect that stems from different terminations of the ferroelectric ultrathin film towards the electrodes magnifies this effect. Combined, the electrically switchable effective change in thickness is as large as 0.15 nm, which dominates the resistive switching effect in the presented junction that involves a 3.2 nm thin PbTiO3 film. This work contributes to the deeper understanding of fundamental mechanisms that lead to tunnel electroresistance and imposes new ways for tailoring the characteristics of electroresistive tunnel junctions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据