4.3 Article

Combining limnology and palaeolimnology to investigate recent regime shifts in a shallow, eutrophic lake

期刊

JOURNAL OF PALEOLIMNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 437-448

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10933-014-9767-5

关键词

Regime shift; Monitoring; Ecosystem; Alternative stable state; Diatoms; Hydrocarbons

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet)
  2. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (WATERS project)
  3. Royal Physiographical Society in Lund (Kungliga Fysiografiska Sallskapet i Lund)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we demonstrate that an integrated approach, combining palaeolimnological records and limnological monitoring data, can increase our understanding of changing ecological patterns and processes in shallow lakes. We focused on recent regime shifts in shallow Lake Krankesjon, southern Sweden, including the collapse of the clear-water state in 1975 and its subsequent recovery in the late 1980s. We used diatom, hydrocarbon and biogenic silica sediment records, in concert with limnological data sets on nutrient concentrations, water clarity, chlorophyll-a and water depth, to investigate the shifts. The shift from clear to turbid conditions was abrupt and occurred over 1 to 2 years, whereas recovery of the clear-water state was more gradual, taking 4-5 years. In 1978, shortly after the first regime shift in water clarity, the diatom community underwent a significant shift. It became less diverse, with decreased abundance of epiphytic and planktonic taxa. Despite rising phosphorus concentrations and lower abundance of submerged macrophytes, Lake Krankesjon has remained in the clear-water state over the past 20 years, although this state seems to be increasingly unstable and susceptible to collapse. The complex reactions of the entire lake ecosystem to major changes in lake-water clarity, as shown by the palaeolimnological variables investigated in this study, emphasize the importance of careful lake and catchment management if a stable, clear-water state is desired.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据