4.5 Article

Hope in the Context of Lung Cancer: Relationships of Hope to Symptoms and Psychological Distress

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 174-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.01.014

关键词

Hope; lung cancer; pain

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA91947]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Hope may be important in explaining the variability in how patients adjust to lung cancer. Objectives. The aim of this study was to examine how hope, as conceptualized by Snyder et al., is associated with multiple indices of adjustment to lung cancer. This theoretical model of hope suggests that people with high levels of hope are able to think about the pathways to goals (pathways) and feel confident that they can pursue those pathways to reach their goals (agency). Methods. We hypothesized that higher levels of hope, as measured by Snyder et al.'s hope scale, would be related to lower levels of pain and other lung cancer symptoms (i.e., fatigue and cough) and lower psychological distress (i.e., depression). Participants in this study included patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer (n = 51). All participants provided demographic and medical information and completed measures of hope, lung cancer symptoms, and psychological distress. Results. Data analyses found that hope was inversely associated with major symptoms of cancer (i.e., pain, fatigue, and cough) and psychological distress (i.e., depression), even after accounting for important demographic and medical variables (i.e., age and cancer stage). Conclusion. The findings of this cross-sectional study highlight the potential importance of hope in understanding adjustment to lung cancer. Future longitudinal research could help reveal how hope and adjustment interact over the course of cancer survivorship. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;40:174-182. (C) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据