期刊
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 597-605出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.004
关键词
Sensitivity and specificity; diagnosis; screening; distress; depression; adjustment disorders; anxiety; palliative care; terminal care; cancer
资金
- Rosemary Fellowship Trust
- UK Clinical Research Network [2816]
- American Cancer Society
This study examined the criterion validity of computer-based screening tools (Distress Thermometer [DT], Brief Symptom Inventory-18 [BSI-18], and General Health Questionnaire-12 [GHQ-12]) in detecting any farm of psychological distress in palliative care patients, compared with a semistructured psychiatric interview, Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN). Patients aged 18 years or older reffered to specialist palliative care services in Leeds completed the computer based, screening tools before SCAN interview by psychiatrists who were blind to screening results. SCAN interviews generated, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) psychiatric diagnoses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis compared the performance of screening tools with SCAN interview in identifying cases of distress. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Of the 226 eligible patients during the study period, 174 consented and 150 completed the study. Fifty-one (34%) patients satisfied ICD-10 criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis, adjustment disorder being the most common one (22%). On ROC analysis, DT, BSI-18, and GHQ 12 showed (in AUC of 0.729, 0.729, and 0.755, respectively. At optimum cutoff values, sensitivity and specficity were 0.77 and 0.59 for DT, 0.78 and 0.62 for BSI-18, and 0.77 and 0.61 for GHQ-12, respectively. These data indicate that more than one-third of palliative care patients experience psychological distress. The three touch screen-based screening tools performed equally well in identifying distress compared with a psychiatric interview. The single-item DT is as good as longer screening tools, with an optimum cutoff of 5 in this population. Depressive disorders may be rarer in this population than commonly thought, in comparison to adjustment disorders. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38:597-605. (C) 2009 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据