4.4 Article

Prevalence of Persistent Pain in the US Adult Population: New Data From the 2010 National Health Interview Survey

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAIN
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 979-984

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.05.009

关键词

Chronic pain; persistent pain; National Health Interview Survey; health-related quality of life

资金

  1. Washington Life Sciences Discovery Fund [LSDF 08-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Published adult prevalence estimates of chronic pain in the United States vary significantly. A more consistent pain measure is needed to assess unmet need for pain management in the general population. In this study, secondary analyses of the 2010 Quality of Life Supplement of the National Health Interview Survey are used to calculate the point prevalence of persistent pain, which we defined as constant or frequent pain persisting for at least 3 months. Rates of persistent pain are also calculated by risk group, chronic condition, and disability status. Findings show that about 19.0% of adults in the United States report persistent pain. Rates of persistent pain are higher among women, adults aged 60 to 69, adults who rate their health as fair or poor, adults who are overweight or obese, and those who were hospitalized 1 or more times in the preceding year. Most adults who report conditions such as arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, or back or joint pain do not describe their pain as persistent. Of the estimated 39.4 million adults who report persistent pain, 67.2% say their pain is constantly present, and 50.5% say their pain is sometimes unbearable and excruciating. Perspective: Persistent pain, defined as self-reported pain every day or most days in the preceding 3 months, is a useful way to characterize health-related quality of life in the general population, and policy makers should consider including this core measure in ongoing health surveys like the National Health Interview Survey and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the authors conclude. (C) 2014 by the American Pain Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据