4.4 Article

Sustained Nociceptive Mechanical Stimulation of Latent Myofascial Trigger Point Induces Central Sensitization in Healthy Subjects

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAIN
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 1348-1355

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.03.010

关键词

Central sensitization; intramuscular electromyography; muscle cramps; myofascial pain; pressure pain threshold

资金

  1. Danish Working Environment Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study is to test if sustained nociceptive mechanical stimulation (SNMS) of latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) induces widespread mechanical hyperalgesia SNMS was obtained by inserting and retaining an intramuscular electromyographic (EMG) needle within a latent MTrP or a nonMTrP in the finger extensor muscle for 8 minutes in 12 healthy subjects Pain intensity (VAS) and referred pain area induced by SNMS were recorded Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was measured immediately before and after, and 10-, 20-, and 30-minutes after SNMS at the midpoint of the contralateral tibialis anterior muscle Surface and intramuscular EMG during SNMS were recorded When compared to nonMTrPs, maximal VAS and the area under VAS curve (VASauc) were significantly higher and larger during SNMS of latent MTrPs (both P < 05) there was a significant decrease in PPT 10 minutes, 20 minutes, and 30 minutes postSNMS of latent MTrPs (all P < 05) Muscle cramps following SNMS of latent MTrPs were positively associated with VASauc (r = 72, P = 009) and referred pain area (r = 60, P = 03) Painful stimulation of latent MTrPs can initiate widespread central sensitization Muscle cramps contribute to the induction of local and referred pain Perspective This study shows that MTrPs are one of the important peripheral pain generators and initiators for central sensitization Therapeutic methods for decreasing the sensitivity and motor-unit excitability of MTrPs may prevent the development of muscle cramps and thus decrease local and referred pain (c) 2010 by the American Pain Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据