4.6 Article

Domain pinning near a single-grain boundary in tetragonal and rhombohedral lead zirconate titanate films

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 91, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.134113

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1005771, OCI-0821527]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I038934/1]
  3. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division ofMaterials Sciences and Engineering [FG02-07ER46417]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I038934/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/I038934/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction of grain boundaries with ferroelectric domain walls strongly influences the extrinsic contribution to piezoelectric activity in PbZr1-x, TixO3 (PZT), ubiquitous in modern transducers and actuators. However, the fundamental understanding of these phenomena has been limited by complex mechanisms originating from the interplay of atomic-level domain wall pinning, collective domain wall dynamics, and emergent mesoscopic behavior. This contribution utilizes engineered grain boundaries created by depositing epitaxial PZT films with various Zr:Ti ratios onto 24 degrees tilt SrTiO3 bicrystals. The nonlinear piezoelectric response and surface domain structure across the boundary are investigated using piezoresponse force microscopy while the cross-sectional domain structure is studied using transmission electron microscopy. The grain boundary reduces domain wall motion over a width of 800 +/- 70 nm for PZT 45:55 and 450 +/- 30 nm for PZT 52:48. Phase field modeling provides an understanding of the elastic and electric fields associated with the grain boundary and local domain configurations. This study demonstrates that complex mesoscopic behaviors can be explored to complement atomic-level pictures of the material system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据