4.3 Article

Bone Transport for Postinfectious Segmental Tibial Bone Defects With a Combined Ilizarov/Taylor Spatial Frame Technique

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 162-168

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e5e160

关键词

trifocal and bifocal bone transport; Taylor Spatial Frame; postinfectious bone defects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess and compare the results of trifocal (two-level bone lengthening with compression at the nonunion site) and bifocal (one-level bone lengthening with compression at the nonunion site) bone transport using the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF; Smith and Nephew, Inc, Memphis, TN) for postinfectious segmental tibial bone defects. Design: Retrospective study of 12 patients with atrophic tibial nonunions. These patients were treated with resection of the nonunion followed by bone transport using the TSF for the segmental tibial bone defects. All patients were treated by the same surgeon (F.S.). Setting: Level I trauma center. Patients/Participants: Twelve consecutive patients treated for postinfectious segmental tibial bone defects between November 2004 and September 2007. Intervention: All patients were treated using the TSF for a trifocal or bifocal technique of bone transport along with associated soft tissue reconstructive surgeries. All patients were additionally treated with 45 days of culture-specific antibiotics. Outcome Measurement: All patients were evaluated by the guidelines of the Association for the Study of the Method of Ilizarov. Results and Conclusion: All patients achieved complete union and eradication of infection. The results were evaluated according to Association for the Study of the Method of Ilizarov criteria: 83% were excellent and 17% were good in terms of bony outcomes; functional results were excellent in 50%, good in 42%, and fair in 8%. Combined Ilizarov/TSF trifocal and bifocal techniques for the treatment of segmental tibial bone defects achieve union without malalignment of the mechanical axis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据