4.5 Article

High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid Increases the Differentiation Potential of the Murine Chondrocytic ATDC5 Cell Line

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 1619-1627

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22691

关键词

high molecular weight hyaluronic acid; chondrogenesis; ATDC5; TNF-; osteoarthritis

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [24791531]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24592191, 24791531] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a group of common, chronic, and painful inflammatory joint diseases. One important finding in OA patients is a remarkable decrease in the molecular weight of hyaluronic acid (HA) in the synovial fluid of affected joints. Therapeutic HA is available to patients in most parts of the world as a viscosupplementation product for the treatment of OA. Previous clinical reports show that high molecular weight HA (HMWHA) more effectively relieves pain than low molecular weight HA (LMWHA). However, the mechanism behind this finding remains unclear. In this study, we investigated whether a LMWHA (Low-0.9MDa) and two types of HMWHA (High-1.9MDa and 6MDa) differentially affected chondroregulatory action. We tested this using ATDC5 cell, a murine chondrocytic cell line widely used in culture systems to study chondrogenic differentiation. We found that HMWHA, especially hylan G-F 20 (High-6MDa), significantly induced aggrecan and proteoglycan accumulation, nodule formation, and mRNA expression of chondrogenic differentiation markers in a time- and dose-dependent manner. In addition, we showed that HMWHA prevented TNF- induced inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, with no effect on cell proliferation or viability. These results reveal that HMWHA significantly promotes chondrogenic differentiation of ATDC5 cells in vitro, and suggest that HMWHA plays a significant chondroregulatory role in vivo. (c) 2014 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 32:1619-1627, 2014.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据