4.5 Article

Intrasynovial flexor tendon repair: A biomechanical study of variations in suture application in human cadavera

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 1652-1659

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22108

关键词

hand; biomechanics

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AR033097]
  2. Center for Musculoskeletal Research [NIH P30 AR057235]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the functional outcomes of intrasynovial tendon suture, prior experiments evaluated individual technical modifications used in the repair process. Few studies, however, have assessed the combinatorial effects of those suture modifications in an integrated biomechanical manner, including a sample size sufficient to make definitive observations on repair technique. Two hundred fifty-six flexor tendon repairs were performed in human cadavera, and biomechanical properties were determined. The effects of five factors for flexor tendon repair were tested: core suture caliber (4-0 or 3-0), number of sutures crossing the repair site (four- or eight-strand), core suture purchase (0.75 or 1.2?cm), peripheral suture caliber (6-0 or 5-0), and peripheral suture purchase (superficial or 2?mm). Significant factors affecting the properties of the repair were the number of core suture strands and the peripheral suture purchase. The least significant factors were core suture purchase and peripheral suture caliber. The choice of core suture caliber affected the properties of repair marginally. Based on these results, we recommend that surgeons continue to focus on multi-strand repair methods, as the properties of eight-strand repairs were far better than those of four-strand repairs. To resist gap formation and enhance repair strength, a peripheral suture with 2?mm purchase is also recommended. Finally, since core suture caliber affected some biomechanical properties, including the failure mode, a 3-0 suture could be considered, provided that future in vivo studies can confirm that gliding properties are not adversely influenced. (c) 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 30:16521659, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据