4.5 Article

Early Joint Tissue Changes Are Highly Correlated with a Set of Inflammatory and Degradative Synovial Biomarkers after ACL Autograft and Its Sham Surgery in an Ovine Model

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 1185-1192

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21404

关键词

synovium; ACL; osteoarthritis; remodeling; qPCR

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While impossible in humans, the mechanisms of early cartilage, bone and meniscal damage can be quantified after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in animal models. We utilized an ovine model to determine if the mRNA expression of inflammatory and degradative molecules (IL-1 beta, IL-6, MMP-1, 2, 3, and 13) in the synovium correlated to changes in joint tissues 2 weeks post-ACL surgery, to test the hypothesis that synovial inflammation is a marker of these changes and possibly their originator. Nine idealized'' ACL autografts were performed and compared with three sham and six normal animals. Using validated protocols, early osteophyte formation, articular cartilage, and meniscal damage were quantified. Synovium was harvested and mRNA expression quantified using qPCR. Multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA) was utilized to correlate synovial mRNA expression in treated and contra-lateral limbs, from all treatment groups with corresponding joint scores. Synovial mRNA expression was significantly elevated in all experimental and sham joints. The MLRA model was a significant predictive tool (p 0.001, R(2) = 0.70) of gross tissue scores with significant contributions from IL-1 beta, IL-6, and MMP-3. Findings suggest that this set of synovial biomarkers is predictive (p < 0.009) of early gross changes of joint tissues after arthrotomy and likely directly involved in the relevant mechanisms, particularly early osteophyte formation, in vivo. (C) 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29: 1185-1192, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据