4.5 Article

Rapid Attachment of Adipose Stromal Cells on Resorbable Polymeric Scaffolds Facilitates the One-Step Surgical Procedure for Cartilage and Bone Tissue Engineering Purposes

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 853-860

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21314

关键词

tissue engineering; stem cells; adipose tissue; scaffold; biodegradable polymer

资金

  1. Dutch Program for Tissue Engineering (DPTE) [BGT.6734]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue provides an abundant source of mesenchymal stem cells. For clinical application, it would be beneficial to establish treatments in which SVF is obtained, seeded onto a scaffold, and returned into the patient within a single surgical procedure. In this study, we evaluated the suitability of both a macroporous poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) and a porous collagen type I/III scaffold for this purpose. Surprisingly, cell attachment was rapid (similar to 10 min) and sequestered the majority of adipose stem cells, as deduced from colony-forming unit assays. Proliferation occurred in both polymeric scaffolds. Upon chondrogenic induction, upregulation of chondrogenic genes, production of glycosaminoglycans, and accumulation of collagen type II was observed, indicating differentiation of scaffold-attached SVF cells along the chondrogenic lineage. Osteogenic differentiation was achieved in both scaffold types, as visualized by up-regulation of osteogenic genes, increase of alkaline phosphatase production over time, and accumulation of bone sialoprotein and osteonectin. In conclusion, this study identifies both poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) and collagen type I/III as promising scaffold materials for rapid attachment of adipose stem cell-like (stromal) cells, enhancing the development of one-step surgical concepts for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. (C) 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:853-860, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据