4.5 Article

Evaluating the effects of mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic metastasis on vertebral bone quality in a new rat model

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 817-823

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21577

关键词

skeletal metastasis; osteolytic; osteoblastic; vertebral bone quality; rat model

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  2. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, Ontario Chapter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal metastases often show mixed areas of enhanced (osteoblastic) bone growth adjacent to areas of thinning (osteolytic) bone. This study aims to quantitatively characterize bone quality and tumor burden within a new rat model of mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic spinal metastases. Mixed vertebral metastases were analyzed in nude rats 21-days post intracardiac injection of Ace-1 canine prostate cancer cells. Vertebral micro-architecture was assessed in mu CT images. Histologic processing quantified tumor burden (PTHrP), osteoclast activity (TRAP), and osteoid formation (Goldner's Trichrome) in 1/2 of all samples. Remaining samples were mechanically tested to failure in compression. Metastatically involved vertebrae exhibited extreme osteolysis, evident through an increase in osteoclasts leading to significantly reduced trabecular bone volume. Metastatically involved vertebrae also exhibited increased osteoid characteristic of osteoblastic lesions. While mechanical properties in tumor-bearing vertebrae were not significantly decreased compared to controls, a strong correlation was found between trabecular volumetric BMD and ultimate force. The highly aggressive Ace-1 skeletal metastases demonstrated predominant osteolysis with some areas of immature, new osteoblastic bone formation. Bone quality resulting from these lesions consisted of decreased structural properties, but without a significant impact on mechanical integrity. (C) 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 30:817823, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据