4.5 Article

Capsule Preservation Improves Short-Term Outcome of Hydraulic Distension in Painful Stiff Shoulder

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 1688-1694

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21446

关键词

painful stiff shoulder; hydraulic distension; joint capsule; rupture; frozen shoulder

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0073706]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0073706] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of intraarticular hydraulic distension (IHD) for a painful stiff shoulder (or adhesive capsulitis) has been affirmed, but whether rupturing the joint capsule during this process is beneficial remains controversial. By monitoring real-time pressure-volume (PV) profiles during IHD, we could infuse the largest possible volume without rupturing the capsule. Using the novel technique, we compared the short-term effects of IHD when the capsule was preserved versus when it was ruptured. Fifty-four patients with a painful stiff shoulder underwent IHDs intended to preserve or rupture the capsule and then classified into capsule-ruptured (n = 26) and capsule-preserved (n = 20) groups, based on the obtained PV profiles. Their profiles were triphasic or biphasic; eight with flat profiles were excluded from the comparison. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3-day and 1-month follow-ups, in terms of pain and range of motion (ROM). Although both groups showed significant increase in ROM and decrease in pain after IHD, the improvements were greater in the capsule-preserved group than in the ruptured group at both follow-up times, and in triphasic and biphasic cases. In conclusion, the therapeutic effects of IHD in short-term follow-ups were enhanced by preserving the capsule. (C) 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:1688-1694, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据